GBARC Forum › Amateur Radio › Builders › Antennas v
A better PL-259?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A better PL-259?
Rob_Walker Offline
Member VE3RWY
***
Posts: 87
Threads: 15
Likes Received: 20 in 11 posts
Likes Given: 46
Joined: Apr 2020
Reputation: 97
#2
2022-03-18, 17:29:53
I'm curious why builders would still solder PL-259 connectors when crimp connectors are stronger and make a better connection?  A crimp connector is not much more cost wise and the price of a hex crimp tool is not a lot of money.

I have a few crimp tools with different dies for different cable sizes.  If anyone wants to borrow a set, let me know.

73 Rob
IP Address: 173.32.104.57
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2021-12-16, 20:51:33
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-18, 17:29:53
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-18, 19:24:20
RE: A better PL-259? - by Richard VE3OZW - 2022-03-19, 07:31:46
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-19, 08:03:47
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-19, 12:55:49
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-19, 19:07:55
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-22, 13:26:29
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-22, 20:16:44
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-23, 10:51:11
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-23, 19:29:31
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-24, 07:16:07
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-24, 07:36:39
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-24, 11:52:14
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-24, 12:13:56
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-24, 21:13:31
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-04-23, 23:04:08

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)