GBARC Forum › Amateur Radio › Builders › Antennas v
A better PL-259?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A better PL-259?
VE3WI Dave Offline
Member
***
Posts: 210
Threads: 100
Likes Received: 94 in 69 posts
Likes Given: 13
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation: 427
#6
2022-03-19, 12:55:49
My opinion IS an engineering study ;-)

73
Dave, VE3WI
IP Address: 173.241.103.229
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2021-12-16, 20:51:33
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-18, 17:29:53
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-18, 19:24:20
RE: A better PL-259? - by Richard VE3OZW - 2022-03-19, 07:31:46
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-19, 08:03:47
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-19, 12:55:49
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-19, 19:07:55
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-22, 13:26:29
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-22, 20:16:44
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-23, 10:51:11
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-23, 19:29:31
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-24, 07:16:07
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-24, 07:36:39
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-24, 11:52:14
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-24, 12:13:56
RE: A better PL-259? - by VE3WI Dave - 2022-03-24, 21:13:31
RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-04-23, 23:04:08

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)